I agree that if the calendar had been changed at the time of the NT, SOMEONE would have corrected it. In case
you have not noticed, we are using the Old Testament to prove the lunar Sabbath and Creation Calendar. The
reason the NT is silent about a calendar change is because they were using the SAME calendar as they were in the
Old Testament.
If an accurate record has been kept since the NT era, how come todays calendar does NOT go back to a fri-sat-sun
crucifixion weekend in ANY of the years that are thought probable for that event? First of all, friday did not exist on
the calendar in the first century. Secondly, the Roman calendar at that time was an EIGHT day market week, not a
seven day week. A seven day week and an 8 day week is apples and oranges.
So even if you count backward in time 7-6-5-4-3-2-1 all the way to 31 A.D. (the most commonly accepted year for
the crucifixion) and superimpose the modern calendar with the lunar phase of the first month of that year, passover
would have fallen on a pagan tuesday, not friday. The lunar cycles have been stable since the first century and any
moon phase calculator with the proper dates entered will reveal this very easy to discover answer.
Passover would have been on the pagan su-day in 29 and 32 A.D.
It would have been on the pagan mo-day in 28 A.D.
On the pagan tu-day in 31 and 34 A.D.
On the pagan we-day in 27 A.D.
And on the pagan th-day in 30 and 33 A.D.
What this proves is that there were no fri-sat-sun weekend Passovers on ANY of the dates between 27 and 34 A.D.
covering all the suspected years of the crucifixion. And the day after Passover in the year of the crucifixion was
most certainly the weekly Sabbath, see Mark 15:42, Luke 23:54-56, John 19:31.
So, which calendar needs corrected? The Creation Calendar or the pagan/papal calendar?
20. Had the Sabbath been wrong at the time of Christ, he would have corrected it, and
there has been accurate records kept since then.
Objections to the Calendar of Creation: